On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 07:48:54PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Noel Jones <[email protected]>:
>
> > I think I posted something almost exactly like this a while ago
> > (year+?). Anyway, I can confirm that I've had this same problem and
> > came up with the same workaround, still in place.
>
> Yeah. Maybe it would make a cool addition to smtp_pix_workarounds!
I guess you'd like:
smtp_pix_header_checks = ...
this feature would be rather a large concession to a problem that needs
to be fixed at the receiving system...
--
Viktor.
