On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Victor Duchovni <victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 04:19:56PM -0700, Stephen Ingram wrote: > >> Agreed. Here is the postfix log for when the ldap table is used: >> >> May 26 14:48:46 smtp postfix/smtpd[5653]: E8EB7CC056A: >> client=terrapin.penumbra.us[192.168.17.42] >> May 26 14:48:59 smtp postfix/cleanup[5663]: E8EB7CC056A: >> message-id=<20110526194846.e8eb7cc0...@smtp.penumbra.us> >> May 26 14:48:59 smtp postfix/qmgr[5156]: E8EB7CC056A: >> from=<st...@penumbra.us>, size=414, nrcpt=1 (queue active) >> May 26 14:49:00 smtp postfix/smtpd[5683]: disconnect from >> terrapin.penumbra.us[192.168.17.42] >> May 26 14:49:04 smtp postfix/smtpd[5683]: connect from >> scan.penumbra.us[192.168.17.43] >> May 26 14:49:04 smtp postfix/smtpd[5683]: C5DB2CC056C: >> client=terrapin.penumbra.us[192.168.17.42] >> May 26 14:49:04 smtp postfix/cleanup[5663]: C5DB2CC056C: >> message-id=<20110526194846.e8eb7cc0...@smtp.penumbra.us> >> May 26 14:49:04 smtp postfix/qmgr[5156]: C5DB2CC056C: >> from=<st...@penumbra.us>, size=871, nrcpt=1 (queue active) >> May 26 14:49:04 smtp postfix/smtpd[5683]: disconnect from >> scan.penumbra.us[192.168.17.43] >> May 26 14:49:04 smtp postfix/smtp[5668]: E8EB7CC056A: >> to=<u...@4test.net>, relay=192.168.17.43[192.168.17.43]:10024, >> delay=30, delays=25/0.04/0/4.9, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok, >> id=24032-10, from MTA([192.168.17.44]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as >> C5DB2CC056C) >> May 26 14:49:04 smtp postfix/qmgr[5156]: E8EB7CC056A: removed > > > The message "E8EB7CC056A" is delivered without any problems. > >> May 26 14:49:04 smtp postfix/error[5684]: C5DB2CC056C: >> to=<us...@penumbra.us>, orig_to=<u...@4test.net>, relay=none, >> delay=0.16, delays=0.13/0.01/0/0.0, dsn=5.0.0, status=bounced (User >> unknown in virtual alias table) > > The domain "penumbra.us" is incorrectly matched a virtual alias > domain by the LDAP table.
And, that is it! I'm trying to make a virtual domain out of the domain that is also local to the system. I added that same domain to the hash table and got the same error. Thank you so much for the help. I really appreciate it. Steve