-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/18/11 13:02, Wietse Venema wrote: > The Postfix documentation only describes the features that are > implemented. Therefore if you can't find something then you can > safely assume that it is not supported.
Dr. Venema, thank you for your reply. As IPv6 adoption is increased I can certainly see a need to segregate an IPv6 relayhost and an IPv4 relayhost, especially in configurations of internal cascaded MTAs acting as egress content inspectors (which may not be IPv6 enabled due to technical or implementation reasons). Perhaps if it is deemed valuable to other Postfix users this feature could be considered for inclusion in future branches. It would be valuable to not have an IPv4 defined relayhost being enforced/utilized for IPv6 capable traffic. - -- - -evilghost -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJN1Ay4AAoJENgimYXu6xOHTaQP/3GF4Y137qVp6kpFxtDFLYWC CzENzY0Cizj4ORZfSQmDXhdBmhpleX2b1jiI+PQ8U6mDKrJGqGp/Y2WrTM6djVhu RllcHX4siLOhOJeF8l+Rk2c+F/CGEtWApsRQ/++iLPRZqBQ5ipxZCR30t530IFWQ OY4VxgOZcLg1GgERiRTZz3uqsBdQEHW1piFhAJOMM1neHfyKHjQYhIOrakbhPMlQ VMSakmfO5ihauG3pU+bCN02YY+aGQDliLXjYHgtZ5DTHsh5B20kpljLGKxEtcvrc 4ha+si1qjulexzVIuz1iogS7sorSLMD5WHGQeDZcWnBgacVpk+/59Xw1URZnNS6L MzlGLmTa9cDLmWM7k0nfwhGqMz9DF4fha0uBagEhxd3R/D/+MxUYV7DQhNA6G4D8 yYe6QfkjXJ0FEKflL7Rf1Lm2pDvqXmHfelJF2UCnerceVfOFaBoA9MpF+XQQjVZC N29lvgzWkHIhrBnoTp/j18bIUDNRYTB4vdDRMquCmWjZUMA8vo8ddxCZikSpv/L4 ZC7MZMQo766MQp0IhJkJQ6UJgEsmfE1gAJaSUBGsJq9QAe+V8dz3IXElKOie/2do gUFd/GGlInivtCuEvehmKWGVFz8iyQr/LqsH48hG/eWcp+e6TuQfuQw7mEPulMN0 7mDeKgiPYohpJaQcszhI =tsKp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
