Le 04/02/2011 20:42, Joe a écrit : > On 02/04/2011 10:42 AM, Steve Jenkins wrote: >> >> Still, I am (well, WAS) disappointed that Postfix 2.3.3 is what >> installs on CentOS 5.5 by default. But Postfix 2.8 wasn't that hard to >> compile. :) >> > > I always try to work with the package management system to keep things > sane and manageable if possible. postfix-2.7 and 2.8 rpms and srpms are > available for centos from several sources. It's pretty easy to replace > the ancient postfix package with a fairly up to date one, and it's one > of the first things I'd do after a centos or rhel install. > > I see that rhel 6 comes with postfix-2.6.6 which is better, but still a > bit conservative. Not all of the rhel/centos packages are out of date, > but they do seem quite sluggish about making any MTA changes. > > FWIW debian/ubuntu seem to be much more current on the versions of > postfix they ship, but even then it's not a bad idea to install a more > recent package than what they ship with. > > Joe
guys, we at the bsd balcony find it funny to see linuxers fighting each other with "my distro is better" and "I can compile faster than you", and more funnily "I was born to destroy bill gates empire". but all this is off topic here.
