Mark Scholten:
> > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Victor Duchovni
> > Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 12:52 AM
> > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 05:02:00PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> > > > I've been running with "smtpd_tls_eecdh_grade = strong" with
> > Postfix
> > > > 2.7 for a while now. No problems to report. Approximately 24,000
> > EECDH
> > > > sessions a week. Of these approximately 75% use AECDH-AES256-SHA,
> > and ~25%
> > > > use ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA.
> > > >
> > > > Perhaps with 2.9 we can finally "mainstream" server-side eecdh
> > support.
> > >
> > > Assuming that these aren't all Postfix-to-Postfix sessions, that
> > would
> > > mean EECDH is burned in by now.
> >
> > That's my take. Previous hop mta name comments include:
> >
> > - Exim 4.72 #3
> > - Websense Email Security (7.3.0)".
> > - XWall v3.46h
> > - SonicWALL 7.3.0.4387
> > - 8.13.8/8.13.8/SuSE Linux 0.8
> >
> > The diversity is a bit low, but the clients are not exclusively
> > Postfix.
>
> Do I see it correctly that I'm missing Exchange (or the SMTP included with
> Microsoft Exchange)? That is the last "bigger" mailserver I know (besides
> sendmail) that is missing I think. I can probably get a test environment
> with Microsoft Exchange and with Sendmail to test it if the information
> might be useful.
This is Sendmail: 8.13.8/8.13.8/SuSE Linux 0.8
Wietse
> Regards, Mark
>
>
>
