Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth: > On 09/24/2010 01:26 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth: > >> The other misfeature that I'd like to point out again is the behavior of > >> been_here() when the hash table is full. > > > > The alternatives to a limited-size hash are a) run out of memory and > > try to deliver mail repeatedly until it is too old or b) bounce > > the excess recipients, neither of which wins a prize for beauty.
Have you already tried the "no RESET_OWNER_ATTR()" solution? Wietse