Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth:
> On 09/24/2010 01:26 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth:
> >> The other misfeature that I'd like to point out again is the behavior of
> >> been_here() when the hash table is full.
> > 
> > The alternatives to a limited-size hash are a) run out of memory and
> > try to deliver mail repeatedly until it is too old or b) bounce
> > the excess recipients, neither of which wins a prize for beauty.

Have you already tried the "no RESET_OWNER_ATTR()" solution?

        Wietse

Reply via email to