Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth:
> On 09/23/2010 01:11 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth:
> >> However, I didn't notice any change such as separate processing of
> >> destination addresses.
> >>
> >> And I also cannot confirm that it uses a new queue id for each
> >> recipient. At which stage should the split happen?
> >
> > When the owner- alias is configured correctly, Postfix creates ONE
> > NEW queue file for ALL recipients in the alias.
> >
> > When the owner- alias is NOT configured correctly, ONE local(8)
> > PROCESS will attempt to deliver ALL recipients in the alias.
>
> When the owner- alias IS configured correctly, HOW is delivery
> distributed to multiple processes?
When you implement owner- alias correctly, the logging will look
as shown below.
- Postfix creates ONE NEW queue file for ALL recipients in the alias.
- Postfix delivers ONE recipient in ONE local(8) delivery process.
Wietse
Sep 22 12:52:19 hostname postfix/local[3210]: 47307924782:
to=<x...@example.com>, orig_to=<yyy>, relay=local, delay=0.01,
delays=0.01/0/0/0, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (forwarded as 494B8924781)
Sep 22 12:52:19 hostname postfix/qmgr[3182]: 494B8924781:
from=<z...@example.com>, size=498, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Sep 22 12:52:19 hostname postfix/qmgr[3182]: 47307924782: removed
Sep 22 12:52:19 hostname postfix/local[3212]: 494B8924781:
to=<recipie...@example.com>, relay=local, delay=0, delays=0/0/0/0, dsn=2.0.0,
status=sent (delivered to mailbox)
Sep 22 12:52:19 hostname postfix/local[3211]: 494B8924781:
to=<recipie...@example.com>, relay=local, delay=0, delays=0/0/0/0, dsn=2.0.0,
status=sent (delivered to mailbox)
Sep 22 12:52:19 hostname postfix/local[3215]: 494B8924781:
to=<recipie...@example.com>, relay=local, delay=0, delays=0/0/0/0, dsn=2.0.0,
status=sent (delivered to mailbox)
