On 13.09.10 16:15, Mark Martinec wrote: > With the help of custom hooks this can be achieved by amavisd itself
Thank you for the sample code and for your detailed explanations regarding the configuration options. > The reason the DKIM document suggests not to sign Received header > fields is for fear that MTAs in the chain may modify them and thus > break a signature. In my experience this practically never happens. My guess is that I am not the only person who wishes to remove Received headers to hide internal mail routing. Anyway, I am content with amavisd allowing me to easily configure which headers are to be signed. -Ralph
