* Richard Chapman <rich...@aardvark.com.au>: > I'm not suer whether this is the correct place to report this - but > if not please advise: > > In the document: > http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html > > In the section entitled: > > > Postfix SMTP/LMTP client policy - SASL mechanism /properties/ > > > and the subsection: > > > Encrypted SMTP session (TLS) > > it recommends: > > A more sophisticated policy allows plaintext mechanisms, but only > over a TLS-encrypted connection: > > /etc/postfix/main.cf: > smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous, noplaintext > smtpd_sasl_tls_security_options = noanonymous > > > I think these should be "smtp_" as opposed to "smtpd_" prefixes as > it is discussing client side sasl. ...
Yes, you've spotted a documentation error. p...@rick -- All technical questions asked privately will be automatically answered on the list and archived for public access unless privacy is explicitely required and justified. saslfinger (debugging SMTP AUTH): <http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/saslfinger/>
