On 2010-08-22 8:38 PM, Stan Hoeppner <s...@hardwarefreak.com> wrote: > Stan Hoeppner put forth on 8/22/2010 7:34 PM: >> So if we reverse the scenario and put the "REJECT" first, it's a final >> decision? If so, and if I've described the situation correctly, why do >> we have this opposite behavior between whitelisting and blacklisting? >> If I've not described this correctly, what am I missing?
> Noel's post answered my question, so ignore my previous message. > > "OK" != accept_it_right_now I guess I need some clarification now... My understanding is this is not true if you have all checks under recipient_restrictions (and delay_reject enabled) - an OK in this case *would* cause the message to be accepted immediately, while a DUNNO would skip to the next check. But in any case, PERMIT/REJECT always happens immediately. Is this correct? -- Best regards, Charles
