On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:39:48AM CEST, Stan Hoeppner <s...@hardwarefreak.com> said: > Robert Fournerat put forth on 8/19/2010 4:46 PM: > > Quoting Noel Jones <njo...@megan.vbhcs.org>: > > > >> Same here. reject_unknown_client_hostname is too strict, but > >> reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname rejects lots of obvious spambots > >> without resorting to an RBL lookup. The false-positive rate is close > >> enough to zero that I would not consider removing this restriction. > > > > Call me a BOFH, but I have no sympathy for mail servers > > that do not pass the FCRDNS test. > > Agreed. Given that the majority of consumer broadband providers in the US > assign rDNS to even all their consumer IP addresses, there's no reason for a > legit mail sending host to not have rDNS.
Humm US is not alone on Internet... -- Erwan
