On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 08:57:00AM +0200, Markus Schwengel wrote:

> In this case I don't like the quarantine function because users
> (senders) should get some kind of notice that their mail was rejected
> because of a virus.

Absolutely NOT. If you ever send any sender notices for viruses here,
you will be filtered rather quickly. Virus sender addresses are "always"
forged, and notices of blocked viruses are the least welcome type of
spam we receive. I'd rather get any other type of spam than bogus "you
sent a virus" notices....


> With quarantine the mail is put into the hold
> queue and nothing else happens.

Viruses should be quietly discarded or quarantined. No sender notices
of any sort. A well designed quarantine may notify the recipient in
many cases, but never the sender.

-- 
        Viktor.

P.S. Morgan Stanley is looking for a New York City based, Senior Unix
system/email administrator to architect and sustain our perimeter email
environment.  If you are interested, please drop me a note.

Reply via email to