> > I have a need to migrate some IP's from a static file to a hash file. These > are singleton IP's (hash CIDR's). > > hash != cidr
It was meant to read "singleton IP's (not CIDR's)". I need to do a little more proof reading before sending out these things. > > i.e. would this be acceptable for this type of map? > > 10.20.0.2 ok > > 10.20.1.91 ok > > ... > yes. but in this case, prefer cidr over hash. I think we are dealing with 50 or so IP's on a bunch of different blocks. The 10.20.x.x above was an example. Almost everything in the mydestination file is currently /32, with the exception of our internal ranges. It's these /32 that would be migrated to a hash.
