> The hard thing when comparing mail solutions is I believe comparing systems > that try to do everything (some include Postfix), versus building from > constituent parts. Historically the "do everythings" have been onerously > complicated, and/or insecure. But I really can't comment on things like SUN > Java Messaging Server, Groupwise, or even current versions of Lotus Notes, > other than to say in my experience such combined products have been > relatively inflexible (hence a lot of the discussion about putting Postfix in > front of Exchange for security and filtering). > > Of course what is really needed to convince suits is someone to take them to > play golf, and explain why paying a lot of money will be good for their > company. >
Well, opensource products still lacks of working "shared groupcalendar and meeting support" I hope that soon there is at least one working caldav server with client support? (thunderbird+lightning+some working caldav server?) -- Eero
