On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Stan Hoeppner <s...@hardwarefreak.com> wrote: > > Except these aren't fully qualified patterns, can generate FPs, and cause > other problems. The patterns I shared are fully qualified, so the chance of > FPs is zero or near zero. Also note the domain specific reject text in my > patterns. > > Your patterns are what many people start out with. They may work fine for a > while on low volume vanity servers for the family and the dog, but they > don't work well on real mail streams at decent sized organizations.
Please don't generalize. The organization size isn't the point. > This was discussed at length on spam-l not too long ago. That's how I ended > up > with the regexp file I shared here, because I was previously using something > generic like that above, and a seasoned OP took pity on me (and others). > > -- > Stan > Disclose the organization rules to receive emails on main website. Put a URL in reject reason to inform the problem (need a patch for build-in restrictions). -- Reinaldo de Carvalho http://korreio.sf.net http://python-cyrus.sf.net "Don't try to adapt the software to the way you work, but rather yourself to the way the software works" (myself)
