>> However in the case where the whitelist is (completely) unavailable for
>> some period of time, I still think that my suggestion applies, don't you
>> agree?
>
> No. It is assumed that you use a sufficiently reliable DNSWL. Ideally
> a local mirror, and if it becomes unavailable you use appropriate
> administrative intervention.
Lol...
My statement is:
"A implies B"
and you respond with: No, because:
"not A"
Logically, even if "not A" is the case, then still you haven't denied
the given implication. In fact in the strictest sense you even affirmed
it, because "not A" implies "A implies B", since false implies everything.
