On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 02:33:37PM +0100,
   postfix-us...@tja-server.de wrote:
> /dev/rob0 wrote:
> >>But as far as i can tell, this is already quite late in
> >>processing the mails!
> >
> >Why do you think so?
> 
> I seem to remember, that the recipient code technically is
> called later - after all headers and maybe even data has been
> read by the server.
> 
> I would like to reject those mails as soon as possible and
> thought, this requires a different place.

Headers *are* DATA, in SMTP terminology. Some headers are added by
your Postfix, but most of them should have been received from the
client.

smtpd_mumble_restrictions happen at the SMTP command indicated by
"mumble", with exceptions:
    smtpd_client_restrictions at the initial TCP connection
    smtpd_helo_restrictions at the EHLO/HELO command
    smtpd_etrn_restrictions at the (rarely used) ETRN command
    smtpd_sender_restrictions at the MAIL FROM: command
    smtpd_recipient_restrictions at the RCPT TO: command
    smtpd_data_restrictions at the DATA command
    smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions at the ".<cr><lf>" at end of DATA

Exceptions: smtpd_delay_reject (default "yes") causes "mumble" ==
client, helo and sender restrictions to be evaluated at RCPT TO:.
(There are reasons for this default setting, see
    http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_delay_reject
for that, and search list archives if interested.)

Only smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions would have access to headers,
except as previously mentioned, those headers are irrelevant in
normal routing and access control decisions. See these:
    http://www.postfix.org/BUILTIN_FILTER_README.html
    http://www.postfix.org/header_checks.5.html
if you're interested in access decisions based on headers, but be
forewarned, it's weak and usually not a good idea (most people who
think header_checks(5) are the answer have been asking the wrong
question.)

Also note that these header_checks are implemented by the cleanup(8)
daemon, not by smtpd(8).

> Thanx for your hint!

You're welcome.
-- 
    Offlist mail to this address is discarded unless
    "/dev/rob0" or "not-spam" is in Subject: header

Reply via email to