On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 06:08:40PM +0100, Stefan Foerster wrote:
> In case of severe server "overload", with postscreen(8) complaining
> about lookup and update times around 400ms almost every mail, is it
> (reasonably) safe as a last desperate measure to put $data_directory,
> or at least the file referenced by $postscreen_cache_map, on a ramdisk
> (e.g. "tmpfs" with Linux)?
Yes, but I would still try to find out why the lookup times are so
absurdly large?
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majord...@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
