On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:15:59 -0600 Stan Hoeppner <s...@hardwarefreak.com> wrote:
> > Well, there's one positive side to this thread Noel. Your reply to > "undisclosed > recipients" instead of the list address broke my postfix-users sort filter. I > just spent 20 minutes trying to figure it out. I tried "received" and > "return-path" and all kinds of header checks in the T-Bird message filter, and > none of them work on this message. They clearly should. > > So now I get to file a bug report on T-Bird as it's clearly not processing the > headers correctly or obeying "custom" headers I plug in. Hell, it won't even > filter on Sender: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org for Pete's sake and Sender > is > built into the filter, not custom, IIRC. > > Regardless of the T-Bird issue, could we all please reply to the list address > instead of burying it in a BCC? That's just plain silly. I only accept mail to post...@johnpeach.com from cloud9.net and I do the same thing for other mailing lists to which I subscribe - that should get rid of your bcc problems...... -- John
