Patrick, Hi Thanks for your reply and for your attention. I think it would be better to find a solution so that we can utilize these two authentication mechanisms. Thanks again.
Warm Regards Ali Majdzadeh Kohbanani 2009/11/13 Ali Majdzadeh <ali.majdza...@gmail.com> > Patrick, > Hi > Thanks for your reply and for your attention. I think it would be better to > find a solution so that we can utilize these two authentication mechanisms. > Thanks again. > > Warm Regards > Ali Majdzadeh Kohbanani > > 2009/11/12 Patrick Ben Koetter <p...@state-of-mind.de> > > * Ali Majdzadeh <ali.majdza...@gmail.com>: >> > Viktor, >> > Thanks for your attention. You are right, but unfortunately we have got >> some >> > in-house developed mail clients which are bound to use cram-md5 >> > authentication mechanism. Well, I think I should investigate on >> integrating >> > LDAP to our architecture and figure out the new opportunities. >> >> If that is only a few and if they can be identified by IP range, offer >> them a >> dedicated Postfix smtpd instance, which uses a separate sasldb database >> without lowering the security standards for the rest of your clients. >> >> p...@rick >> >> -- >> All technical questions asked privately will be automatically answered on >> the >> list and archived for public access unless privacy is explicitely required >> and >> justified. >> >> saslfinger (debugging SMTP AUTH): >> <http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/saslfinger/> >> > >
