Markus Schönhaber put forth on 10/30/2009 10:05 AM: > Simon Morvan: > >> I notice that event if the recipient address doesn't exists, the >> check_policy_service (greylist) got evaluated, causing higher load than >> needed. Isn't reject_unauth_destination there to block inexistent >> recipients ? > > No, that's what reject_unlisted_recipient is for.
I only have reject_unauth_destination on my relay-only server, and sending to an invalid recipient address returns: 550 5.1.1 <inva...@domain.tld>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in relay recipient table I don't have reject_unauth_destination. I guess which parameter one needs to implement depends on whether one uses local deliver? -- Stan
