URCentral @ Gmail wrote: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List > <grkni...@scent-team.com> wrote: > > >>> Correcting myself; there are two hash databases specified on the live >>> server, like this; >>> >>> check_sender_access >>> hash:/etc/postfix/chk_sender_local >>> hash:/etc/postfix/chk_sender_access >>> >> If this was specified in recipient restrictions, it is equivalent to: >> check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/chk_sender_local >> check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/chk_sender_access >> >> This refers to the depreciated syntax of bare map in a restriction class. >> >> Postfix does not allow check_(*)_access to list multiple tables. >> The restriction *must* be repeated each time or an assumption takes >> place based on the past. >> > > Ahh, that makes sense. So given the above example; > > check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/chk_sender_local > check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/chk_sender_access > > would work? >
Indeed.
