Mark Johnson wrote: > Here is the postconf -n > > [r...@mail postfix]# postconf -n >
This seems fine, mostly using defaults. Can you please provide a non-verbose, log of a mail transaction you feel is affected? Barney had mentioned this too and it is quite important. Do you have a DNS caching server locally? > > > --- On Mon, 8/17/09, Barney Desmond <barneydesm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> From: Barney Desmond <barneydesm...@gmail.com> >> Subject: Re: postfix performance >> To: postfix-users@postfix.org >> Date: Monday, August 17, 2009, 3:49 PM >> 2009/8/18 Evan Platt <e...@espphotography.com>: >> >>> At 10:30 AM 8/17/2009, you wrote: >>> >>>> I just make the test and the performance was not >>>> >> good. Outgoing 1K email >> >>>> was around 568 seconds. >>>> >>>> Any insight is appreciated. >>>> >>> Although this will likely be out of my area of being >>> >> able to help you, >> >>> someone else here probably can, but you'll want to >>> >> post relevent logs and >> >>> postconf -n output. >>> >>> But 568 secoonds, my guess is there's something >>> >> configured MAJORLY wrong. >> >> Indeed, we need `postconf -n` to spot any glaring config >> errors, and >> log entries to see the problem actually happening. A >> description of >> how you send this mailout would also be good. Obviously we >> don't want >> a full log for all 1000 messages, but a representative >> sample would be >> good. As a minimum, we should be able to track at least a >> few messages >> from start to finish. >> >> > > > >
