Nick Sharp wrote: > Sorry, was referring to the same log in my previous email, but didn't > consider people may not always have that handy.. > > Aug 3 22:08:27 mail1 postfix/smtpd[25798]: NOQUEUE: reject: CONNECT from > unknown[58.171.194.208]: 554 5.7.1 <unknown[58.171.194.208]>: Client host > rejected: Access denied; proto=SMTP >
This transaction did not have a SASL auth that was successful. Therefore, any permit_sasl_authenticated will not work. All log entries where SASL is successful, in smtpd, will have "sasl_username=" and "sasl_method=" defined
