On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:18:52 +0200 Robin Smidsr__d <ro...@smidsrod.no> wrote: [snip] > Willy De la Court wrote: > > > Does this mean that all of the reject rules are in fact not > RFC-conformant? > > The reason I mention reject_invalid_helo_hostname is that I'm unsure > if the IPv(4|6) address syntax is part of this rule (postfix version > 2.5.5, distributed with ubuntu 9.04). > > What about the two other reject rules? As far as I can tell, they are > both non-conformant.
Your server, your rules. > > -- Robin > -- John
