On Jul 30, 2009, at 2:48 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 7/30/2009 8:26 AM, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
I assume it is better to put the reject_unknown_recipient_domain and
reject_unverified_recipient controls after the rbls en policy
services.
This way only address verification is needed when the mail passes the
rbls en policies?
Actually, I think it should be the other way around...
You want to put the least expensive checks first...
reject_unverified_recipient is, I believe, much cheaper than RBL
lookups... but maybe I'm wrong?
Mmmm, I'm using transport maps to forward mail to the final mail
server. So the verify should contact the remote server and I think
that is almost as expensive as a RBL check. Also I want to use the
address_verify_map cache and want it to be as small as possible.
--
Best regards,
Charles
