On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 15:47 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * Mark Goodge <m...@good-stuff.co.uk>: > > > I wouldn't call it a bug, since it's a feature that works as designed. > > It is, however, a design choice that makes the feature less useful than > > it otherwise could have been. But the point here is that content > > inspection isn't a core part of the job of an MTA anyway, so if the > > rather simplistic version built in to Postfix isn't sufficient then > > you're no worse off than if it didn't have the facility to begin with. > > The fact that it does it at all is a bonus that may be useful in some > > cases where whitelisting isn't necessary. > > I only use it for stuff I absolutely don't want to see. Everything > else gets handled by amavisd-new
Which is flaky. The fix is to make the content scanner in Postfix work as it should - or do we keep making excuses for it so we don't upset *you know who*
