also sprach Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org> [2009.05.23.1442 +0200]: > Before making architectural recommendations, it would help to step > back into the reality of how policy servers and milters work. For > one thing, policy servers don't handle message content, and for > another, Milters must be able to see every SMTP protocol step.
What about header/body_checks? Those would make sense in smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions, wouldn't they? What am I missing to understand why they aren't? Is it the fact that those checks should apply to all mail processed by postfix, whether received by smtpd or not? -- martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/ "syntactic sugar causes cancer of the semicolon." -- epigrams in programming spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
