On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 05:21:54PM +0200, Julius Thijssen wrote:
> Hmm.. the reason I wanted to do this is precisely because it already caused
> harm
> by upsetting silly users that worried they were doing something wrong in the
> way their clients were configged. Explaining that it does no harm is not
> really
> functional in such cases, is my experience..
I don't know what obligations you have to these users. In mutt, I have
keyboard bindings that generate "canned" responses to various user-error
scenarios with our email quarantine. It takes two keystrokes to dispatch
a canned response to a confused user. The canned response can politely
suggest that no further correspondence on the issue is expected.
This said, the rewrite is also harmless, so long you draw the line
somewhere sensible.
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majord...@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
