Drew Tomlinson a écrit : > mouss wrote: > I have no preference for header_checks. What makes client_access > better? Is it less expensive? >
it's time to learn how smtp works. in particluar, the fact that the message is sent after the DATA command. which means that if you reject before DATA, you avoid having to read the message (including the headers). >> .[snip] >> >> but you'll have a lot of work to track the domain names. See if uribl is >> good for you... >> > > Yes, I'm using several blacklists. you didn't understand what I was suggested. > But recently I'm getting a bunch of > spam from a few domains and wanted to block it. the problem is that you're talking about spam in general, but your original post suggests "snowshoe spam". in any case, the real place to discuss this is spam-l or the like.
