Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 03:26:50PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > >> --On Wednesday, April 29, 2009 8:40 AM -0400 Wietse Venema >> <wie...@porcupine.org> wrote: >> >>> Postfix 2.6 stable release candidate 3 is available. If this has >>> no problems, then Postfix 2.6.0 will happen soon. The same code is >>> also available as Postfix 2.7 experimental release 20090428. >> Although the download link is correct, the text is wrong: >> >> Postfix 2.6.0 stable release candidate 2 >> >> rather than >> >> Postfix 2.6.0 stable release candidate 3 >> >> <http://www.tigertech.net/mirrors/postfix-release/index.html> >> >> A random sampling of mirrors around the world showed this. > > No, in fact RC3 is right one.
ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/index.html Shows: Postfix 2.6.0 stable release candidate 2 Source code | PGP signature | Release notes | Change log Note that the text says: "release candidate 2". However, mouse over the "Source code" link and it points to: ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/official/postfix-2.6.0-RC3.tar.gz Which correctly points to the latest update, RC3. Quanah was simply pointing out the mismatch between what is says and what it is. Bill
