but that's likely not the only point implied above.
My take is that for most users that is the wrong tradeoff. A sensibly
robust setting with better longevity serves most users better than a
fine-tuned point-in-time optimisation for unrealistic threats.
well-enuf said.
my take-homes from this are:
-- generalized 'best practice' stats for smtp usage would be nice, but
dream-on; lacking those, 'sensible' is ... sensible.
-- leave the pfx smtp tls settings at defaults, and move on
-- https tls depends on which clients i choose to serve; for me, it's _not_ the
'public at large'.
thx for the comments.
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
