On 2025-03-19 at 23:42:44 UTC-0400 (Wed, 19 Mar 2025 20:42:44 -0700)
Doug Hardie via Postfix-users <bc...@lafn.org>
is rumored to have said:
On Mar 19, 2025, at 15:24, Bill Cole via Postfix-users
<postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
On 2025-03-19 at 17:52:02 UTC-0400 (Wed, 19 Mar 2025 14:52:02 -0700)
Doug Hardie via Postfix-users <bc...@lafn.org>
is rumored to have said:
In the web page:
https://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_unverified_recipient,
the example given uses reject_unauth_destination. Are those the
same, or is that a typo?
They are NOT the same, they are distinct restrictions. Both have
detailed descriptions in that section.
That is what I expected. However, the example for _recipient uses
_destination which doesn't seem right.
The example following that list of valid restriction directives seems to
me to relate to the whole list, which describes the valid
smtpd_recipient_restrictions directives. The example is not specifically
about the final item in the list (reject_unauth_destination) which just
happens to immediately precede it.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo@toad.social and many *@billmail.scconsult.com
addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
