Gioele Pannetto via Postfix-users:
> On 11/03/25 13:40, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Gioele Pannetto via Postfix-users:
> >> On 10/03/25 18:05, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> >>> According to the text, automatic BCC recipients are subject to
> >>> virtual_alias_maps expansions. And I just confirmed experimentally
> >>> that recipient_bcc_maps lookup results are indeed subject to
> >>> virtual_alias_maps expansions.
> >>>
> >>> If virutal_alias_maps expansions dop not work as expectedk, you
> >>> need to append the @domain in each entry on the right-hand side of
> >>> the table.
> >> Thanks for the reply, but I'm not understanding. I'll give you an example:
> >> I have an alias on al...@giopan.dev that points to gio...@giopan.dev and
> >> to gio...@pannetto.com (both are hosted on the same server).
> >> I send an email to al...@alias.giopan.dev (alias.giopan.dev is an alias
> >> to giopan.dev), the email is correctly delivered to the correct
> >> recipients, but the BCC is not triggered.
> > Simple logic.
> >
> > sender/recipient BCC lookup happens BEFORE virtual alias expansion.
> >
> > Therefore, the result of alias expansion IS NOT used for sender/recipient
> > BCC lookup.
>
> Sorry but in the first email you said that "automatic BCC recipients are
> subject to virtual_alias_maps expansions"
Indeed. Virtual alias lookups happen AFTER sender/recipient BCC lookups.
This is the same as saying that
Sender/recipient BCC lookups happen BEFORE Virtual alias lookups.
If this is a contradiction for you, then we cannot communicate.
Wietse
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
