On 2025-01-14 19:48, pgnd via Postfix-users wrote: > > "Spamhaus's initial recommendation was to disable QNAME minimization > altogether, but ISC disagrees: the correct solution is for Spamhaus to fix > its broken servers. QNAME minimization is an important privacy protection > that is enabled by default in BIND and in most standards-based DNS > implementations today."
This is the difference between some committee bureaucrats or creators of some protocol reference implementation and guys running this protocol in the wild at large scale. Minimization for RBL is absolutely pointless, because the full domain must reach the provider _by_definition_. Doing triple+ count of queries "just because some ISC folks are happy for their server" is nonsense. The "correct" solution is to pay Spamhaus for excessive queries, if you like their service. _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
