On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 05:04:32PM +1100, Phil via Postfix-users wrote:
> On 16/11/24 16:58, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 01:38:25PM +0800, Hua Y via Postfix-users wrote:
> >
> > > > default_destination_rate_delay = 3
> > > > default_extra_recipient_limit = 50
> > > >
> > > > works for small setups . . .
> > > Can you please explain the two options a bit more?
> > For the first,
> > seehttps://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#default_destination_rate_delay
> > but this is not recommended, since it applies to all transports, even
> > ones you probably don't want to rate limit.
> >
> > For the second, it is unlikely you or anyone else should be changing the
> > default. The suggestion is most likely the result of a misunderstanding.
> >
>
> Is default_extra_recipient_limit not limiting the number of recipients in a
> given message ?
No. And, what did you have in mind anyway?
- Limiting the recipient count of incoming SMTP message envelopes?
- Limiting the recipient count of outbound SMTP deliveries
(splitting the envelope for larger messages by doing multiple
deliveries each with at most that many recipients)?
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
