On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:32:24AM -0500, Walt Park wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have some develpers that want to do.. strange things with the to, from,
> and/or reply_to fields for routing. They are concerned that there may be a
> limit to the string length they can use either before or after the @ in the
> address in the to: from:, and reply_to: .
If they are concerned, they are probably doing the wrong thing. The syntax
of email addresses is defined in RFCs 5321 and 5322. Most relevant are:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321#section-4.5.3.1.1
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321#section-4.5.3.1.2
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321#section-4.5.3.1.3
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321#section-4.5.3.1.4
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majord...@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
