On Mon, 10 Jun 2024, 12:37 pm Jeff Peng via Postfix-users, <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
why not postscreen for this purpose?
On 2024-06-10 at 09:35:25 UTC-0400 (Mon, 10 Jun 2024 14:35:25 +0100)
Gilgongo via Postfix-users <gilgo...@phreak.co.uk>
is rumored to have said:
Thanks - I thought about postscreen, but wasn't sure if it would be
overkill for such a small server? Could look again though.
On 10.06.24 10:11, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
Postscreen is not 'overkill' in any sense. It is designed to shed load
from spambots, so as long as you don't enable the after-greeting
tests, it will be a lighter load than a Perl policy filter.
Not mentioning pregreet test which is AFAIK impossible with policy server.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
BSE = Mad Cow Desease ... BSA = Mad Software Producents Desease
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
