Thank you so much for the reply, and thanks so much for Postfix, which I’ve used for many years.
If I continue using QMQP I’ll gather more definitive proof; but it sounds like (a) I have a bug in my QMQP protocol handler (likely); and/or (b) I’m using QMQP in a way it wasn’t designed (certainly). Thanks again for the prompt reply and the wonderful software you’ve built. Brad On March 21, 2024 at 6:56:45 AM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users (postfix-users@postfix.org) wrote: Brad Koehn via Postfix-users: > I'm trying to deliver email with Postfix 3.7.10 using `qmqpd`. > Unfortunately when I do this, the email is often unreadable by a > variety of email clients. I suppose you mean "receive" mail with Postfix using qmqpd. > Curiously, if I deliver the same email directly to Dovecot via > LMTP, clients have no issue with the message. I expected the > opposite to be the case: by bypassing all the cleanup functionality > my emails would be harder to read. > > I'm early in my investigation, but I was wondering what might be > going wrong? I notice for starters that the version I deliver via > QMQP has the `Content-Length` header removed; th LMTP version > preserves it. This is configurable with message_drop_headers (default: bcc, content-length, resent-bcc, return-path). But I think you have worse problems. > In another case, the QMQP version has an extra CRLF before the > "This is a multi-part message in MIME format" text, which I believe > makes it unrenderable; the LMTP version doesn;t have that extra > line Your message is malformed: there was no empty line after the last header line. When email is out-of-spec, it may not be delivered in it malformed state. Wietse _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
_______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
