On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, mig wrote: > Thanks for reply,
Please, don't top-post. > But I'm still a bit confused about the SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html: > > "Restriction lists are still evaluated in the proper order of (client, helo, > etrn) or (client, helo, sender, recipient, data, or end-of-data) > restrictions." > > I agree, all restriction lists are evaluated on the RCPT TO (because of the > delayed reject), but not just after the first RCPT TO. It looks they evaluate > again on each RCPT TO. Can you provide evidence for this claim? > Do all items behave like this or is it only the check_policy_service? I mean, > if everything is evaluated again on each RCPT TO, then if I place > reject_rbl_client into smtpd_client_restrictions, the rbl check will run > needlessly more times? No. -- Sahil Tandon <sa...@tandon.net>
