On 2023-12-10 at 16:37:16 UTC-0500 (Sun, 10 Dec 2023 22:37:16 +0100)
Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users <carlos.vela...@nimastelecom.com>
is rumored to have said:
And doing the same work in 2 different places can be called software
efficiency?
Bill Cole via Postfix-users escribió el 11/12/2023 a las 15:31:
since it was created and semi-documented by Sendmail Inc. It is de facto
controlled by the current developers of Sendmail, but I don't believe
anyone is working to make Milter better, at least not in ways that would
break compatibility.
On 11.12.23 15:37, Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users wrote:
No one is talking here about breaking any compatibility, re-read the messages.
_You_ have complained why Received: is not seen by milter, here:
https://marc.info/?l=postfix-users&m=170223488205099&w=2
The answer has been given and documented: this is how milter works from the
beginning.
However, I agree that this makes work hard for SpamAssassin, because this
way SA does not know, which adders have been added by local milters/policy
servers and thus can be trusted - SA only trusts headers before locally
added Received:
... headers added by spf,dkim,dmarc milters would be very useful for SA
processing.
So, it would be great if postfix could optionally add (or, better, not remove)
locally added Received: header, although milters would need to implement
this feature first.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
"The box said 'Requires Windows 95 or better', so I bought a Macintosh".
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
