Hi, Charles Marcus wrote: > At a minimum, we need output of postconf -n (NOT copy/paste from > main.cf), and complete logs showing the spam going out... > > the less obfuscation you perform, the easier it will be to help you... >
sorry to bother you all again... my fight against the spam is still on the go (and I think I'm losing...). I was searching through my mail.info log... what do you think about these lines? Mar 26 09:27:11 athene postfix/cleanup[29784]: 19F65E72ED: message-id=<[email protected]> Mar 26 09:27:11 athene postfix/qmgr[28323]: 19F65E72ED: from=<[email protected]>, size=279, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Mar 26 09:27:11 athene postfix/virtual[29798]: 19F65E72ED: to=<[email protected]>, relay=virtual, delay=0.18, delays=0.12/0.04/0/0.02, dsn=5.1.1, status=undeliverable (unknown user: "[email protected]") Mar 26 09:27:11 athene postfix/qmgr[28323]: 19F65E72ED: removed Mar 26 09:27:11 athene postfix/cleanup[29800]: 48D7EE72ED: message-id=<[email protected]> Mar 26 09:27:11 athene postfix/qmgr[28323]: 48D7EE72ED: from=<[email protected]>, size=279, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Mar 26 09:27:11 athene postfix/smtpd[29704]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from mail02.mail.esat.net[193.120.142.82]: 450 4.1.1 <[email protected]>: Recipient address rejected: undeliverable address: unknown user: "[email protected]"; from=<[email protected]> to=<[email protected]> proto=ESMTP helo=<mail02.mail.esat.net> Mar 26 09:27:11 athene postfix/virtual[29798]: 48D7EE72ED: to=<[email protected]>, relay=virtual, delay=0.02, delays=0.01/0.01/0/0, dsn=5.1.1, status=undeliverable (unknown user: "[email protected]") Mar 26 09:27:11 athene postfix/qmgr[28323]: 48D7EE72ED: removed I'm worried about this "double-bounce" user... any hints? Regards, Ivan -- Ivan Ricotti ------------------------------------------- eLabor sc - via G. Garibaldi 33, 56127 Pisa tel: +39 050970363 web: http://www.elabor.biz email: [email protected] GnuPG KeyID: DFD581C5 - 13/11/2003
