I guess I only expected logging output because I can't see to figure out why the following:

filter unix - n n - 10 pipe -v flags=Rq user=my_user argv=/usr/bin/receiver -f ${sender} -- $ {recipient}

Doesn't seem to work. When I run the script via the command line (as shown in the readme) it works like a charm. But for whatever reason I can't even figure out if postfix is trying to use the filter, let alone if it is failing. Getting log output from pipe would have been nice, but if that's not the correct way to proceed then I'm at a loss for what to look at next.

Any tips on getting to the bottom of it?

On Mar 3, 2009, at 10:58 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:

On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 10:39:36AM -0500, Erik Morton wrote:

Mar  3 10:32:03 my_host postfix/local[2862]: A2629A967B:
to=<newsw...@myhostname.com>, relay=local, delay=0.09,
delays=0.07/0.01/0/0.01, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (forwarded as B0274A969F)

This message is delivered via local(8) which forwards it

Mar  3 10:32:04 my_host postfix/smtp[2863]: B0274A969F:
to=<e...@readmedia.com>, orig_to=<newsw...@myhostname.com>,
relay=my_relay_ip[my_relay_ip]:587, delay=0.33, delays=0/0.01/0.16/0.16,
dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 n23AcrHO026291 Message accepted for
delivery)

via smtp(8) to a remote relay. Why do you expect to see log entries from
pipe(8)?

--
        Viktor.

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.

To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majord...@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>

If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.

Erik Morton
readMedia
518.429.2832
www.readmedia.com

Reply via email to