Le Tue 27/01/2009, Chris Babcock disait > On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:48:43 +0100 > Erwan David <er...@rail.eu.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 02:37:22PM CET, Tolga <to...@ozses.net> said: > > >>> or by the From: line > > >>> > > >>> Regards, > > >>> > > >>> /Tolga > > >>> > > >> > > >> Your own message proves this to be incorrect: > > >> > > >> From: Tolga <to...@ozses.net> > > >> > > > > > > > > > :0 > > > * ^From owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org > > > Postfix > > > > > > works perfectly > > > > It will depend on your delivery agent, I think. > > I use > > > > *^Sender: owner-postfix > > .listes.postfix/ > > "From:" != "From " > > Tolga is filtering on the envelope sender, not the header field. The > colon in first post was an error. The list id header is the most likely > to remain consistant, but sender is a good choice too. Filtering on the > envelope sender is not a good idea because you never know when some > protocol like VERP or BATV may be implemented, breaking your filter > rule.
Delivering to a maildir, through procmail, I have no "From " in the mail. That's why I say id must depends on the delivery agent.
