mouss:
> Victor Duchovni a ?crit :
> > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 03:31:52AM +0100, mouss wrote:
> >
> >> Victor Duchovni a ?crit :
> >>> [snip]
> >>> Why per-recipient transport lookups? Often better to rewrite to a domain
> >>> where the entire domain is handled by lmtp(8).
> >>>
> >> is there a benefit in avoiding per recipient transports?
> >
> > Simplicity, also reduces temptation to do LDAP or SQL transport lookups,
>
> unfortunately, this is exactly what I want to do: put everything in *sql
> to ease mgmt. of course, it is possible to dump the sql data, but I am
> talking about a web UI where I'd prefer the web app no have any
> privileges. I guess a cron (to dump data) is the best I can do if I
> don't want to write an "update" daemon?
High-latency maps such as LDAP and SQL are OK for smtpd or cleanup
(because these processes run in parallel) but not trivial-rewrite
(because there is only one qmgr). This applies not only to transport
maps but also to maps that define address classes.
Wietse
