On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 04:08:09PM -0500, ja...@monsterjam.org wrote:
> and heres my logs now
>
> Jan 2 16:04:57 ohs postfix/smtp[18389]: B08B018A00:
> to=<someu...@monsterjam.org>, relay=outgoing.verizon.net[206.46.232.12]:25,
> delay=0.89, delays=0.08/0.28/0.35/0.17, dsn=2.5.0, status=sent (250 2.5.0 Ok.)
> Jan 2 16:04:57 ohs postfix/qmgr[18371]: B08B018A00: removed
> Jan 2 16:05:12 ohs postfix/smtp[18389]: E50B018A02: to=<someu...@gmail.com>,
> relay=outgoing.verizon.net[206.46.232.12]:25, delay=15,
> delays=0.24/11/0.34/4.4, dsn=2.5.0, status=sent (250 2.5.0 Ok.)
> Jan 2 16:05:12 ohs postfix/smtp[18389]: E50B018A02: to=<someu...@yahoo.com>,
> relay=outgoing.verizon.net[206.46.232.12]:25, delay=15,
> delays=0.24/11/0.34/4.4, dsn=2.5.0, status=sent (250 2.5.0 Ok.)
> Jan 2 16:05:12 ohs postfix/qmgr[18371]: E50B018A02: removed
>
> so there WAS a delay after the first one, but the second two seemed
> to go out together.. so we are making progress.. i think.. ;)
That's two recipients in a *single* delivery. Is there a problem with
that? Postfix is correctly adding delays between message deliveries.
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majord...@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
