Hello,

I initiated a similar thread, few days ago, with interesting responses.
Have a look at it:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2008-12/0010.html

Summaryzing, there's a chance of legitimate mail being filtered. See the
former thread for examples and a nice discussion :-)

PS: And thanks to all who have contributed to it!

Cheers,
-Roman

Geert Hendrickx escribió:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 10:15:55AM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>> Gabriel Hahmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm new to the list and have a problem with my mail system. Recently I'm
>>> receiving a lot of spam emails coming from the internet but the sender is a
>>> user from my domain. Then I tried the same thing directly from other system,
>>> as described below:
>>>
>>> telnet mailsystemwithproblem 25
>>> helo testdomain
>>> MAIL FROM: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> RCPT TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> DATA
>>> test
>>> .
>>>
>>> I've done this with success, and the machine that i've used to telnet is not
>>> in the mynetworks or other parameter.
>> This makes sense; MXs outside your networks should be able to send mail
>> to your domains.
>>
>>> The problem is that all my users are receiving spam from themselfs. My
>>> server is not an open relay because from outside I can't send email to other
>>> domains, but if somebody connects and send to my own domain it works like I
>>> said before.
>> /etc/postfix/main.cf:
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>>      ...
>>      reject_unauth_destination
>>      check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/copycats
>>      ...
>>
>> /etc/postfix/copycats:
>> testdomain.com       REJECT
>>
>> Be aware that your own users will not be able to send email to each
>> other unless they're on mynetworks or SASL authenticated (both permits
>> should precede the reject_unauth_destination directive).
> 
> 
> Note that this will also block mail coming from your own users through
> forwarders or mailing lists that do not rewrite the original sender.
> 
> (eg. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> 
>       Geert
> 
> 

Reply via email to