DJ Lucas a écrit : > LuKreme wrote: >> On 2-Dec-2008, at 20:21, DJ Lucas wrote: >>> I can find absolutely no reason to inadvertently mislead, or worse, >>> intentionally deceive the recipient by forging the envelope sender's >>> address. In fact, the only reason I can see, is >>> to intentionally deceive the recipient. Is there any other reason? >> Sure there is. > > No there isn't.
Yes. there is;-p can we agree to disagree or do we need to contact the UNO? > AFAIK, unless I'm misunderstanding something, the rest > of your message simply puts what I said above in different terms and > agrees entirely. **my mom** was in the From header...nowhere else. > The From header can be changed up to say that it came from somebody > else. I don't care about that. The check in question is in the smtp > transaction, not the data. > > -- DJ Lucas > >
