D G Teed a écrit : > Perhaps "non standard" but it works best for us. > 98% of our virtual map is mapped to one of three inbox > servers, while the other 2% want to forward their > stuff to gmail or some special service. It seems > the most flexible way to run a mapping.
but it is not. actually, relay_domains is the most flexible. and if not, then virtual_mailbox_domains is my second choice. but let me not get into this. > I think the Postfix docs should include this method as > a valid one for preventing backscatter. did you read ADDRESS CLASS README? because it doesn't help to debate docs improvements with people who didn't read nad understand the available docs. > So many answers > I've read say you require relay_recipient_maps to prevent > backscatter generation, while one can get the same > prevention with the right virtual mapping set up. > There are many ways to setup a mail system. there are many ways to get it right, and there are many more ways to get it wrong. if you can get it right, feel free to be as imaginative as you can/want. but if you are not as confident, then follow general setup advice. if you need non-free (audit|consulting|securing|tuning|washing your sockets|...), some of us here will be pleased to "help" you. > Thanks for the confirmation on that. > > --Donald >
