Bill Weiss wrote:
t??ba([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:00:54AM +0300:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:14:25 +0100
"Martin Strand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Of course, they expect you to setup your servers properly with
SPF/DKIM/etc but you probably already know about that.
Martin
But why yahoo do that? What is yahoo?? Why? Why we have no problem with
the others "largest email providers" like gmail, live etc? Why we are
addicted to do SPF etc to deal with yahoo? Is not for yahoo to make
theirs servers more reliable like others? Or does not yahoo have brains
and material capabilities to do that?
Yahoo is betting that they are big enough that you're willing to jump
through some hoops to get to their users. Given the responses to this
thread, it looks like that bet is working out for them.
If Google started prioritizing the GSPF (Google-enhanced SPF) signed email
coming in tomorrow, do you really think that most of us wouldn't set it
up?
as far as I know, GSPF = "Guess SPF" which guesses that your server is
authorized by using the rDNS. for example, if your server is
foo.example.com, then it is probably ok to send mail on behalf of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with no need to set SPF records. as a result, GSPF works
"naturally".
